The Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi rejected the petitioner's anticipatory bail application because it was not formally pressed by the learned counsel during the hearing on 07.03.2019.
Application rejected as not pressed by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 119 of 2019
Shamim Ansari … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Zulekha Khatoon … Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A. Shekhar, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P. For O.P. No.21 : Mr. K.K. Mishra, Advocate
------
Order No.03 Dated- 07.03.2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner do not press this anticipatory bail application.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is rejected as
not pressed.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu/Gunjan-
Shamim Ansari
The State of Jharkhand
Zulekha Khatoon
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
