Single judge held the contempt petition became infructuous and dismissed it with no detailed reasons. The order consists of two paragraphs after listing parties.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 371 of 2018
Versus
Coram: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---------For the Petitioners : Mr. R.P. Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : A.C. to G.P. II
05/20.9.2019 Mr. R. P. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners, has submitted that this
contempt petition has become infructuous.
This contempt petition is, accordingly, dismissed as being infructuous.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
Rakesh/-
Mukesh Kumar Yadav
Kanhai Sao
Saiyed Rizwan @ Soni
Pachhe @ Pache Pali Kerai
Markus Gagrai
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
