The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed this contempt petition as infructuous. The petitioner's counsel argued that the petition had become infructuous, leading to its immediate disposal.
The contempt petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 214 of 2018
Bijay Kumar Tiwary. .... .Petitioner
Versus
Coram: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : A.C. to G.P. II
05/20.9.2019 Mr. R. P. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that this
contempt petition has become infructuous.
This contempt petition is, accordingly, dismissed as being infructuous.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
Rakesh/-
Bijay Kumar Tiwary
The State of Jharkhand
Sri S.K.G.Rahate
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
