Sayed Sahnawaz Alam Alias Shanawaz Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand

-----CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Anil Kumar, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, A.P.P For the C.B.I. : Mrs. Nitu Sinha, Spl. P. P. ------

¶16

Order No.16 Dated- 16.09.2019

¶17

Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that since the petitioners have been granted the privileges of anticipatory bail in connection with Dhanbad (Bank More) P.S. Case No.749 of 2014 and R.C. Case No.71 of 2017, hence, there is no necessity of praying for anticipatory bail application in these cases, hence, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these anticipatory bail applications with liberty to produce the appropriate documents before the investigating officer.

¶18

Permission accorded.

¶19

These anticipatory bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶20

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶21

Animesh/

Sayed Sahnawaz Alam Alias Shanawaz Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sayed Sahnawaz Alam Alias Shanawaz Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akhauri Punit Sujeet Sinha Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sharad Poddar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vikash Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Gopal Das Vs the State of Jharkhand through Vigilance

Sayed Shanawaz Warsi Alias Shanawaz Alam Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Shipul Barai Vs the State of Jharkhand