Allowed

Vikash Kumar Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC13 Sept 2019A.B.A./523/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an anticipatory bail petition. The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, contingent upon his cooperation with the investigation and the deposit of an interim victim compensation amount.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail subject to deposit of Rs. 5,00,000 as interim compensation, furnishing bond, and cooperation with investigation.

Vikash Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

ABA No. 523 of 2019

¶3

Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikash Kumar … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶4

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv. For the State : Addl. P.P.

¶5

08 / 13.09.19 Heard the parties.

¶6

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Sadar (M) P.S. Case No. 564 of 2017 registered under Sections 323, 341, 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 D.P.Act.

¶7

Both the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 are present in the court today. The petitioner is not ready to resume his conjugal life with the opposite party no. 2 in view of her past conduct but opposite party no. 2 is ready to resume her conjugal life with the petitioner.

¶8

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also ready and willing to pay Rs. 5,00,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the informant without prejudice to his defence hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶9

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶10

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of eight weeks from the date of this order, the

¶11

petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 5,00,000/- by way of demand draft drawn in favour of informant as ad interim victim compensation and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., 1^st class, Ranchi in connection with Sadar (M) P.S. Case No. 564 of 2017 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶12

In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the petitioner, learned court below is directed to issue notice to the informant and release the demand draft in her favour on proper identification forthwith.

¶13

In case the said amount is deposited by the petitioner the same will be adjusted towards maintenance, if any, between the parties or full and final settlement between the parties, if any.

¶14

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶15

Smita/-

Vikash Kumar Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kashyap Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sunil Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Etwari Turiya Vs the State of Jharkhand

Akhauri Punit Sujeet Sinha Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sharad Poddar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Gopal Ji Pandey Vs the State of Jharkhand