Bablu Kumar Chandravanshi Alias Baban Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

The petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414/34 IPC and Sections 25(1-B)a/26/35 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. There is alleged recovery of two live cartridges and a mobile phone from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 31.03.2019 and at least considering the length of judicial custody, he may be given the privilege of regular bail.

¶15

Learned A.P.P opposes the petitioner’s prayer for bail.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No. 102/2019.

¶17

(RAJESH SHANKAR, J)

¶18

Satish/-

Bablu Kumar Chandravanshi Alias Baban Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu Kumar Chandravanshi Alias Baban Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramchander Mahli Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kundan Kumar Paswan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ganesh Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Prakash Yadav Alias Prakash Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mazar Ansari Alias Manzar Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ganesh Munda Vs the State of Jharkhand