Allowed

Ramchander Mahli v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC5 Aug 2019B.A./4468/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed regular bail to the petitioner accused under various IPC, Arms, and Explosive Substances Act charges, directing release upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of similar amount.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount each to satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega.

Ramchander Mahli Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

B.A. No. 4468 of 2019 Ramchandar Mahli @ Ramchandra Mahli …Petitioner -V e r s u s-

¶3

The State of Jharkhand ...Opp. Party CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

¶4

For the Petitioner : - Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma, A.P.P.

¶5

05/05.08.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to make necessary correction with regard to name of the petitioner in the cause title of the present bail application, in course of the day.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶7

Petitioner is an accused for the offences punishable under Sections 147/148/149/307/387/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, under Sections 25(1-B)a/26/27/35 of the Arms Act and Sections 4/5 of Explosive Substances Act.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. There is alleged recovery of a crude bomb from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 09.09.2018. On instruction, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge has already been framed against the petitioner and at least considering the length of judicial custody, the petitioner may be given the privilege of regular bail.

¶9

Learned A.P.P. opposes the petitioner’s prayer for bail.

¶10

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 09.09.2018 and that the charge against him has already been framed, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega in connection with Bolba P.S. Case No. 11 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. No. 449 of 2018.

¶11

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

¶12

Ritesh

Ramchander Mahli v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramchander Mahli v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Jha Vs the State of Jharkhand

Babudhan Soren Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mangal Hansda Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kundan Kumar Paswan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ganesh Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Abdul Hakim Alias Abdul Hakim Ansari Alias Raju Vs the State of Jharkhand