Petitioner failed to appear despite multiple adjournments due to lack of diligence. Court dismissed the PIL petition for non-prosecution.
Present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (PIL) No. 3201 of 2012
All India Progressive Women’s Association (AIPWA) Through its National and State Secretary Sunita---
---Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ratnaker Bhengra
For the Petitioner: None For the Resp - State: Mr. Rishi Pallava, JC to A.A.G. For the Resp No. 2: M/s Sumeet Gadodia, Ranjeet Kushwaha, Advocates For the Resp No. 6: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Dwivedi, Advocate
15/ 12.02.2018 No one appears for the petitioner. Counsel for the State is present.
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 and 6 are also present.
of diligence to prosecute the matter any further. In those circumstances, present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
( Aparesh Kumar Singh, J )
Ranjeet/
All India Progressive Women's Association
Union of India
Don Bosco Tech
Aparesh Kumar Singh
Ratnaker Bhengra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
