The High Court at Ranchi dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition as withdrawn by the counsel after observing that the petitioner had failed to provide instructions despite repeated adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P. No. 1097 of 2012
Bipin Bihari Pathak -----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Santosh Kumar Singh ----- Opp. Parties ---
CORAM: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ratnaker Bhengra
For the Petitioner: Mrs. Asmita Shrivastava, Advocate For the O.P. - State: A.P.P.
14/ 12.02.2018 This petition has been pending since 2012. Learned counsel for the petitioner took time on successive occasions earlier to file supplementary affidavit to bring on record the material exhibits and deposition of witnesses in order to make good the points in support of the prayer for grant of leave to appeal. The matter was adjourned on the previous occasion by way of another indulgence clearly indicating that no further indulgence would be granted on that count.
( Aparesh Kumar Singh, J )
( Ratnaker Bhengra, J)
Ranjeet/
Bipin Bihari Pathak
The State of Jharkhand
Sri Santosh Kumar Singh
Aparesh Kumar Singh
Ratnaker Bhengra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
