In this criminal revision, the petitioner's counsel submitted the file could not be traced. The court expressed that the petitioner was not serious in pursuing the case and dismissed the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 372 of 2002
Vikash Ekka ….. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajen Sahay, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P.
06/Dated: 13/03/2018
When the case is called out, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the file could not be traced out.
It appears that petitioner is not serious in pursuing the case.
Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Sunil/
Vikash Ekka
State of Jharkhand
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
