The applicant withdrew the anticipatory bail application due to his arrest during the pendency of the case. The court dismissed the application as infructuous.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.B.A. No. 6087 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Deepak Kumar Sanwaria @ Dipak Kumar Sanwaria……Petitioner Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr …… Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate For the State : A.P.P ----- 05/Dated: 13/03/2018
When the case is called out, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during pendency of this case, the petitioner has been arrested. Hence, he does not want to press this anticipatory bail application, as the same has become infractuous.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed not pressed.
( Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Raman /
Deepak Kumar Sanwaria @ Dipak Kumar Sanwaria
The State of Jharkhand & Anr
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
