persons returned back his money nor got the land registered in his favour. After legal notice on 04.09.2005 both of them came to his office and on being asked to return the money or to get the land registered in his name, the accused informed him that price of the land had enhanced, therefore Rs. 1.5 lakh more was to be paid for execution of the sale deed. After some altercation, the complainant agreed to give Rs.50,000/- and rest of the amount at the time of execution of the sale deed. Opposite Party no.2 was asked to prepare the agreement paper and after being satisfied with it, he gave Rs. 50,000/- to the accused persons. Manoj Pandey and O.P. Singh were also present there. However, after 10 days on inquiry from the Registry Office, Dhanbad, he got information that land was already sold before the second agreement dated 04.09.2005. He also found that land belonged to opposite party no.3 and not opposite party no.2. He further stated that his signature is not on the agreement of sale dated 04.09.2005. The first agreement was executed in the year 1997 and at that time he had good relationship with the accused persons and he had executed that agreement in good faith. He had identified the writing and signature of the accused persons on Ext.1. No separate receipt of taking Rs.50,000/- were mentioned in the schedule. It was mentioned in the agreement that the accused persons had agreed to give Rs.3.5 Lakhs by 06.05.1997.
