The court dismissed a PIL filed by Uma Shankar Mahto regarding pollution from a plant in Ranchi as the petitioner failed to remove defects despite multiple extensions and appeared to have lost interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (PIL) No. 6017 of 2016
Uma Shankar Mahto -----Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ratnaker Bhengra
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the Resp-State: Mr. H.K. Mehta, A.A.G.
05/ 22.02.2018 Learned counsel Mr. Rajeev Kumar submits that the petitioner has
taken no objection from his office and he does not represent him any more.
2
ash generated in the plant in the decoaled mine pit of Rajrappa Open Cast Mine of CCL up to 30.06.2018 vide reference No. D-833 dated 31.03.2016 and accordingly, the Unit is doing so. Permission has also been given to the Respondent No. 7 for dumping of fly ash at the proposed Eco Park at Rajrappa, CCL vide Reference No. D-2833 dated 22.06.2017.
Ranjeet/
Uma Shankar Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
The Chief Secretary, State of Jharkhand
The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi
The Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board
Aparesh Kumar Singh
Ratnaker Bhengra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
