Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous due to petitioner's prior arrest and judicial custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7089 of 2017 Arvind Kumar Rawani @ Arvind Kumar … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … ... Opp. Party. -----CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN.
----For the petitioner: Mr. Ranish Kumar, Advocate. For the State: Addl. P.P.
04/24.10.2018. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already been arrested and taken into judicial custody, thus, this application has become infructuous.
Since the petitioner has already been arrested, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as it has become infructuous.
(Ananda Sen, J)
Sharma/
Arvind Kumar Rawani
The State of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
