Allowed

Pradeep Mahto v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC27 Feb 2018A.B.A./561/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case, directing surrender with bail bonds and conditions including deposit of application fees, investigation cooperation, and statement recording under 72 hours notice.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail on conditions including deposit of Rs.15,000, surrender by 26.03.2018, furnishing of sureties, and cooperation in investigation.

Pradeep Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 561 of 2018 Pradeep Mahto ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite party --------CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite party : APP

¶2

¶3

02/Dated: 27.02.2018

¶4

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 414, 420, 120(B) of I.P.C.

¶5

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

¶6

Learned A.P.P has opposed the anticipatory bail application.

¶7

Be that as it may, I am inclined to admit the petitioner on anticipatory bail on following conditions:-

¶8

(i) Petitioner shall deposit Rs.15,000/- before the President/Secretary, Jharkhand High Court Advocates' Association, Ranchi as cost on or before 12.03.2018. On deposition of amount by the petitioner, the President will issue receipt to him. The amount will be utilized only for the welfare of learned members of the Jharkhand High Court Advocates' Association.

¶9

(ii) After deposition of the aforesaid amount, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below on or before 26.03.2018 and in the event of his arrest or surrender, the court below shall enlarge the above named petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand) with to sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in connection with Tatisilway P.S. Case No.75/2017, corresponding to G.R. No.6579/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further on the date of surrender, petitioner shall file the receipt of the aforesaid deposition in the court below.

¶10

(iii) Petitioner is further directed that along with the bail bonds, he will furnish his cell number and xerox copy of AADHAR Card in the court below.

¶11

(iv) Petitioner is directed to give undertaking that he will join in investigation.

¶12

(v) It shall be open for the I.O of this case that if he wants to record the statement of the petitioner, he will file an application through APP and the court below shall release the cell number of the petitioner to the I.O., thereafter the I.O will give 72 hours' notice tot he petitioner fixing date, time and place and, thereafter, petitioner will appear and get his statement recorded. If petitioner fails to do so, then the I.O. will be at liberty to file application through APP for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶13

Let a copy of order be communicated to the court below and also to the President/ Secretary, Jharkhand High Court Advocates' Association, Ranchi and also handed over to the learned APP for transmission to the I.O.

¶14

(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)

¶15

Pramanik/

Pradeep Mahto v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Mahto v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarif Mondal And Ors. Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Laxmi Kasi Alias Laxminath Kasi Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Shanti Pandey And Ors. Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Munna Mahto And Anr. Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Ajay Kumar Prajapat Alias Ajay Kumar Vs The State Of Jharkhand and Anr.

Shailendra Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand