The single-judge bench of this High Court allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Prayer to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was allowed; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 434 of 2018
Dipak Rabidas ….. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P.
--------- 05/Dated: 04/04/2018
When the case is called out, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Sunil/
Dipak Rabidas
The State of Jharkhand
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
