Abdul Sattar Khan v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
In this anticipatory bail matter, the High Court confirmed the provisional bail granted to the second petitioner after noting that the underlying dispute was settled and the first petitioner had died.
What did the court decide?
Confirmed the provisional anticipatory bail granted to Saida Begum.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 1255 of 2018
1.Abdul Sattar Khan @ Abdul Sattar
- Saida Begum @ Syeeda Begum …… Petitioners
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
2.Firdous Ali …… Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
For the Petitioners :Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State :A.P.P For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Amit Kr. Sinha, Advocate
09/Dated: 23/10/2018
Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dumka (M) P.S. Case No. 61 of 2017, corresponding to G.R. No. 449 of 2017 for the offence under sections 323, 341, 342, 498A, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 3/4D.P. Act.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the provisional anticipatory bail granted to the second petitioner should be confirmed in light of the compromise and death of the first petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Abdul Sattar Khan @ Abdul Sattar
- petitioner
Saida Begum @ Syeeda Begum
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
- respondent
Firdous Ali
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./1255/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court