Single-judge Bench rejected the petitioners' anticipatory bail application. The Court declined to grant bail due to the serious and grave nature of the allegations made in the pending criminal case initiated under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code.
Anticipatory bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4289 of 2018
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P ----- 03/Dated: 22/10/2018
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No. 76/2018, corresponding to G.R. No. 3060/2018, the case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 379, 307, 384, 386,114, 427 of the Indian Penal Code.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In view of nature of allegation as alleged against the petitioners, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the trial court.
( Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Raman/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail in the underlying criminal case.
Whether the allegations against the petitioners warrant the release on bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Toppo and Ors.
The State of Jharkhand
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
