Md Jubrail Ali Alias Jubrail Ali Alias Jurbrail Ansari v. The State Of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9350…
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9350…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9350 of 2016
Md. Jubrail Ali @ Jubrail Ali @ Jurbrail Ansari................Petitioner Versus
State of Jharkhand ………… Respondent
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen
…… For the Petitioner : Mr. (Md. ) Sajad Yunus, Advocate For the State : Mr. APP ……
02./18.11.2016 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is an accused in connection with Keredari P.S. Case No. 22 of 2016 [G.R. No. 1132/2016], registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 323, 325, 324, 326, 307, 158, 435, 436, 337, 338, 120B, 353, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged that the petitioner is one of the members of the mob, who tried to create some disturbance during Ramnavmi Procession.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 20.04.2016 and other co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court vide B.A. No. 7418 of 2016 on 17.09.2016.
Learned APP opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of allegation and custody of the petitioner, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh in connection with Keredari P.S. Case No. 22 of 2016, corresponding to G.R. No. 1132 of 2016.
Mukund-/cp. 3
Md. Jubrail Ali @ Jubrail Ali @ Jurbrail Ansari
State of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court