Anticipatory bail application dismissed as it was not maintainable in circumstances where a proclamation had already been issued. Due to non-appearance of the petitioner, the State advocate filed the arguments alone.
Application dismissed as not maintainable given the issuance of proclamation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A. B. A. No. 23 of 2016
Lalkeshwar Kumar @ Lalkeshwar Pasi, son of Binda Choudhary Resident of village and P.O. - Chakpur, P.S. Hisuwa, Dist. - Nawada Bihar … … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
--For the Petitioner : None For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, A.P.P.
04/07.04.2016 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner inspite of repeated
calls.
However, Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, learned A.P.P., submits that proclamation under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued in the year 2012.
In such circumstance, this anticipatory bail application being not maintainable is, hereby, dismissed.
(R. Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Umesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application is maintainable when the criminal court has already issued a proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lalkeshwar Kumar @ Lalkeshwar Pasi
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
