The High Court dismissed a contempt petition filed by a retired employee. The court noted that a reasoned order confirmed payment of post-retirement dues to the petitioner and disposed of the contempt proceedings without a substantive dispute.
Contempt petition dismissed; proceedings dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 443 of 2014
Surendra Nath Mishra S/o Late Sumant Mishra R/o Deo Markandey, P.S Gurari, Rohtas, Bihar -----Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
For the Petitioner: Mr. Krishna Shankar Advocate For the O.P.-MADA: M/s Bhawesh Kr., Ravi Kr., Rahul Kamlesh, Advocates
05/ 06.02.2015 A show cause has been filed by the learned counsel for the opposite parties
enclosing the reasoned order dated 06.12.2014 indicating that the admissible post retirement and other service dues of Rs. 4,12,604/- is payable to the petitioner. Counsel for the opposite parties submits that payments are to be made in installments as per the reasoned order and the scheme being made for retired employees of MADA.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J)
Ranjeet/
Surendra Nath Mishra
The State of Jharkhand
M/s Mineral Area Development Authority
Aparesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
