The High Court of Jharkland granted bail to the petitioner, accused of theft under sections 379 and 411 IPC, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.4578 of 2015
Bikash Yadav @ Vikash Yadav
..... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo For the State : A. P.P.
2/15.07.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sarawan P.S. Case No.107 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No.780 of 2015.
Petitioner was apprehended after the theft of solar plate.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Bikash Yadav @ Vikash Yadav is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri A. Prasad, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Deoghar, or his successor , in connection with Sarawan P.S. Case No.107 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No.780 of 2015.
(H. C. Mishra, J)
R.Kumar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail in a theft case under sections 379 and 411 IPC,
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bikash Yadav @ Vikash Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
H.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
