The High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear and steps for service were not taken after the last date of hearing.
The petition and connected matter(s) were dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 2 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(Crl) No. 260/2022
Owais Altaf Bhat
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
UT of J&K and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R 04.11.2022
There was no representation on behalf of petitioner on the last date of hearing; same is the position today as well. Even steps for service have not been taken. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
Dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected CM(s).
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
04.11.2022 Manzoor
Owais Altaf Bhat
UT of J&K and Ors.
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
