In a withdrawal petition, the judge accepted the counsel's application to withdraw the instant writ petition and dismissed it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 101 Suppl. Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 2436/2022 CM No. 6175/2022
Shaheena Akhter and Anr.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Sajad Ahmad Bhat, Advocate
Vs.
UT of J&K and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Asifa Padroo, AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R 03.11.2022
After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he wants to withdraw the instant petition. His statement is taken on record.
In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
03.11.2022 Manzoor
Shaheena Akhter
UT of J&K
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
