This order dismissed an appeal in default due to non-prosecution as the petitioner showed no representation or interest. Any interim direction was vacated.
No substantive relief provided; appeal dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 36
Regular Cause List
THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CFA No. 129/2009
M/S Karan Chand Thapper and Bros.
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
UT Of JK and others
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. M. Tufail, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER
03.11.2022
Since there is no representation for the petitioner and having regard to the relief claimed, it appears that petitioners are not interested, otherwise they would have appeared in this case. The appeal is dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
03.11.2022
“ Imtiyaz”
IMTIYAZ UL GANI 2022.11.04 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/S Karan Chand Thapper and Bros
UT Of JK and others
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
