The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a writ petition rendered infructuous due to an order passed by the respondents on 15.10.2022, vacating any interim direction.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 52 Regular Cause List
THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) no. 1054/2021
Mubeena And another
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Shabaz Sikander, Advocate
Vs.
UT Of JK and others
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Illiyas Laway, GA Mr. S. R. Khawar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
02.11.2022
Mr. Shahbaz Sikander, appearing counsel for the petitioners submits that respondents have passed order dated 15.10.2022.
In view of the passing of such order, this writ petition has become infructuous, accordingly this petition is dismissed having been rendered infructuous.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 02.11.2022 “ Imtiyaz”
IMTIYAZ UL GANI 2022.11.04 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mubeena And another
UT Of JK and others
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
