The court held that the service dispute raised in the writ petition must be adjudicated by the Central Administrative Tribunal and directed transmission of the matter.
Matter directed to be transmitted to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Srinagar Bench for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 37 Regular List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Case: SWP no. 808/2018
Archoo Fatima
….petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Shuja-ul-Haq, Advocate
v/s
State of J&K & ors. …respondent(s)
Through: Mr. T. M. Shamsi, ASGI
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 05.04.2022
Despite availing last and final opportunity, reply has not been filed. List for final consideration on 26.05.2022.
According to the learned counsel for the respondents, the issue involved in the writ petition in essence is a service dispute and has to be adjudicated upon by the Central Administrative Tribunal.
The contention is being admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Having regard to the nature of controversy involved in the petition coupled with the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the matter is directed to be transmitted to the Central Administrative Tribunal,
Srinagar Bench for adjudication.
Parties to appear before the Tribunal on 10.05.2022.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
Srinagar
YASMEEN RASHID05.04.2022 2022.04.0 8 04:39 I attest to the accuracy andYASMEEN, PS integrity of this document
Archoo Fatima
State of J&K
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
