The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear on consecutive hearing dates. Any interim direction stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 67 Regular list
IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
OWP No. 509/2017
Abdul Majeed Sheikh and others
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
State of J&K and others
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. M. A. Chashoo, AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
04.04.2022
On the last two consecutive dates of hearings, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Today also when the case was called out, nobody turned up to represent the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the matter. The same is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 04.04.2022
ARIF
Abdul Majeed Sheikh and others
State of J&K and others
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
