Petitioner's counsel stated instructions to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn along with connected interim application and vacated any interim direction.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected IA dismissed; interim direction, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 13 Regular List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Case: OWP no. 734/2016 IA no. 1/2016
Ghulam Mohammad Najar ….petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Khurshid Ahmad, Adv. v/s State of J&K & ors. …respondent(s) Through: Ms. Insha Haroon, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 05.04.2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is under instructions
from the appearing counsel to withdraw this writ petition. His statement is taken on record.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith connected IA.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated forthwith.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
Srinagar 05.04.2022 YASMEEN, PS
YASMEEN RASHID 2022.04.08 04:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ghulam Mohammad Najar
State of J&K
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
