Petitioner in a contempt petition did not appear for two consecutive hearings. The Court closed contempt proceedings and dismissed the petition, allowing revival within six weeks.
Contempt petition dismissed; liberty to revive within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 10 Regular List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Case: CPOWP no. 47/2016
Arifa Jan ….petitioner(s)
Through: None.
v/s
G. M. Dar and ors. …respondent(s)
Through:None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 05.04.2022
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner for the last two consecutive hearings. None appears today as well, suggesting that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the contempt petition.
The contempt proceedings, as such, are closed and contempt petition dismissed.
The petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition within a period of six weeks from the date of passing of this order, in case cause survives.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
Srinagar 05.04.2022 YASMEEN, PS
YASMEEN RASHID 2022.04.08 04:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Arifa Jan
G. M. Dar and ors.
Javed Iqbal Wani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
