Petitioner was absent in person and unrepresented on the hearing date. The court dismissed the special writ petition for non-prosecution, noting the petitioner has lost interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 21
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 515/2013 IA No. 703/2013
Joginder Kour
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER
The petitioner had remained unrepresented on 09.11.2021 as well on 28.12.2021. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner today also. The absence of the petitioner shows that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the present petition, otherwise, she would have appeared before this Court. As such, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. In case, the petitioner is still interested, she can seek revival/restoration of the present petition.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
Jammu 11.03.2022 Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Joginder Kour
State of J&K
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
