A single judge of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed an original writ petition (OWP No. 303/2011) for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's continued absence in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 9
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 303/2011 IA No. 402/2011
Aurangzeb
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the last
couple of hearings.
The continued absence of the petitioners makes it clear that he has lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. Therefore, the present petition is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
Jammu 11.03.2022 Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Aurangzeb
State of J&K
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
