The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition filed by Lal Kumar as infructuous after counsel submitted that the matter was time-barred.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.27
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWPNo.1766/2013 IA No. 2569/2013
Lalit Kumar
…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:Mr. Jagatjeet Singh, Advocate
v/s
State of J&K and others
…Respondent(s)
Through:Mr. Amit Gupta, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEVINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that with the passage of
time, the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the H I G H petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered O F J A M M U & C O U R T infructuous. K A S H M I R A N D
L A D A K H
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
Jammu 11.03.2022 Javid
Lalit Kumar
State of J&K
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
