The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear for the last two hearings, indicating a lack of interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 39
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 116/2014 IA No. 132/2014
Harbans Lal
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER
Nobody has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner for the last
couple of hearings which shows that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute
the instant matter. Therefore, the present petition along with connected IA is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
Jammu 07.03.2022 Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Harbans Lal
State of J&K
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
