Umer Nawaz Khan v. Union Territory of J and K and Anr. (Home Department)
Case brief
What is this about?
Advance List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 216 Advance List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
(Through Virtual Mode)
WP(Cr1) No. 28/2020
Umer Nawaz Khan
…. Petitioner/Applicant(s)
Through:Mr. Wajid Haseeb, Advocate
V/s
Union Territory of J&K and another
…..Respondent(s)
Through:Mr. B. A Dar, Sr. AAG
Coram : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the detenue has been
released from the custody on 12.04.2020, therefore, nothing survives for
consideration in this petition. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the aforesaid submission, this petition has become infructuous
and is accordingly dismissed.
| (Sindhu Sharma) Judge |
||
|---|---|---|
| SRINAGAR | ||
| 06.07.2020 | ||
| SUNIL-II | ||
| Whether the order is speaking | : Yes/No |
|
| Whether the order is reportable | : Yes/No |
Umer Nawaz Khan
Union Territory of J&K
Sindhu Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court