Dismissed
Madhu Narayan Verma and Anr. v. State Th.Home Deptt.and Ors.
J&K HCOWP/55/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 1 s HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 1
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 55/2010 (O & M)
(Through Audio Calling)
Madhu Narayan Verma and another …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. M. I. Sherkhan, Advocate (Through Audio Call, 8899266000) v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
following reliefs:
“(i) Writ of prohibition prohibiting the respondents from interfering into the marital and peaceful life of the petitioners as they have contracted their marriage legally, with free will, with consent of each other and being major.
(ii) Writ of mandamus, commanding the official respondents to provide protect to the petitioners and protect the life/personal liberty of petitioners.
(iii) Any other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be issued in favour of the petitioners and against the respondents”.
relief was granted. Thereafter, the petitioners have never persuaded the
present matter as the same was not taken up in the last ten years.
2 OWP No. 55/2010
in the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 09.06.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.06.16 15:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Madhu Narayan Verma and another
State of J&K and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court