The petition in a special writ petition under Section 343 of the J&K Service Rules, 1994 (if applicable by context not explicitly stated) or similar proceeding was held to be infructuous by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir, and the petition was dismissed without reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 60
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SWP No. 37/2005 (O & M) (Through Audio Calling)
Daljeet Singh and others …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Rahul Pant, Advocate.
(Through Audio Call, 9419190995)
v/s
State through Home Department and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prayer made
in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 08.06.2020 Vijay Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
VIJAY KUMAR 2020.06.09 10:16 I agree to specified portions of this document
Daljeet Singh and others
State through Home Department
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
