This is a single-paragraph order where the writ petition filed for protection of life and liberty due to anti-rustic marriage was dismissed as infructuous because no interim relief was granted and the petitioners never pursued the matter thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.58
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 42/2010 (O & M)
Rekha Rani Alias Naseema Begum and another …Petitioner(s)
Through:-None.
v/s
State of J&K and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
their life and liberty on account of having married against the wishes of their
family members.
present matter.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu
09.06.2020
Shivalee
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
SHIVALEE KHAJURIA 2020.06.17 17:23 I am approving this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant protection of life and liberty to petitioners due to marriage against family wishes.
Whether the petition is maintainable when no interim relief was granted and petitioners never pursued the matter.
Rekha Rani Alias Naseema Begum and another
State of J&K and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
