This order dismissed a writ petition seeking protection of life and liberty on account of marriage against family wishes. The court held the prayer infructuous as no further grievance was raised post-notice, indicating no threat to life or liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.07
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 16/2013 (O & M)
Ashok Kumar and another …Petitioner(s)
Through:- None.
v/s
State through Director General of Police and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
their life and liberty on account of having married against the wishes of their family members.
respondents were directed to ensure that none interferes into the married life of the petitioners.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu 08.06.2020 Paramjeet
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No
PARAMJEET SINGH Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No 2020.07.29 17:34 I am approving this Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition for protection of life and liberty due to forced marriage remains maintainable after absence of threat
Whether a prayer for protection renders infructuous absent subsequent grievance
Ashok Kumar and another
State through Director General of Police and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
