This is a one-line order declaring a writ petition infructuous and dismissing it. No substantive legal proposition is advanced.
Petition declared infructuous and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 3 Suppl. 1
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
OWP No. 21/2010 (O&M) (Through Audio Calling)
Jatinder Krishan Bhat …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Ms. Supriya Singh Chauhan, Advocate (Through Audio Call, 7889839976)
v/s
State of Jammu and Kashmir and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer made
in the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Jammu
10.06.2020
SUNIL-I
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
SUNIL KUMAR 2020.06.29 13:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jatinder Krishan Bhat
State of Jammu and Kashmir
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
