Writ petition (OWP 1139/2018) before J&K High Court became infructuous as counsel did not press it forward; petition dismissed and any interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 299
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
(Through Video Conferencing at Jammu)
OWP 1139/2018 IA (1/2018)
M/s Satyapaul Sharma and Sons
…Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate (Through video conference)
v/s
Union of India and others
… Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the instant writ
petition has become infructuous, as such, is not pressed.
Dismissed as not pressed.
Interim direction, if any, shall stands vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI)
JUDGE
Jammu 10.11.2020 Bir
BIR BAHADUR SINGH 2020.11.17 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/s Satyapaul Sharma and Sons
Union of India
JAVED IQBAL WANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
