Shanti Devi v. Mansa Ram and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir permitted the petitioner's withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it accordingly, vacating any interim directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 244
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
(Through Video Conferencing at Jammu)
OW104 No. 83/2016 IA No. 1/2016 CM No. 4589/2020 IA No. 1/2018 CM No. 6013/2019
Shanti Devi …Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. Piyush Gupta, Advocate.
v/s
Mansa Ram and others ….Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the
petition. Permitted. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE
Jammu 09.11.2020 Renu
RENU BALA 2020.11.18 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Shanti Devi
Mansa Ram
Javed Iqbal Wani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court