Execution petition where the State had not filed the promised SLP. The court directed respondents to comply with the judgment in question, subject to the outcome of any SLP that may be filed, within four weeks, and listed the matter for compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
Ex. Pet. No. 1 of 2024
Date of decision: 02.05.2024
| Uttam Chand Vij | …Petitioner | |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| State of H. P. & Ors. | …Respondents |
Co ram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the Petitioner: Mr. M. C. Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y. W. Chauhan, Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.Gs. and Mr. Raj Negi, Dy. A.G.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 01.05.2024. Even on the previous date an application for extension of time for filing compliance affidavit had been filed by the respondents-State, upon which the Court passed the following order:-
“CMP-T No. 225 of 2024
Be registered. The applicants/respondents have filed this application for extension of time.
Having perused the contents of the application and
given the fact that the applicant/petitioner is a senior citizen aged about 84 years, we deem it appropriate to
2
defer the consideration on this petition by two weeks. Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of. Execution Petition No. 1 of 2024
List on 02.05.2024.”
List for compliance on 30.05.2024.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) 2nd May, 2024 Judge
(sanjeev)
1 issue framed by the court
Should the respondents be directed to comply with the underlying judgment despite an SLP not yet being filed?
Uttam Chand Vij
State of H. P.
Ors.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
