This execution petition directed respondents to implement a referenced judgment within four weeks, subject to the final outcome of a pending SLP filed by the respondents in Suraj Mani's case.
Respondents directed to implement judgment within four weeks, subject to outcome of SLP in Suraj Mani's case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.513/2023
Decided on: 27.3.2024
Satya Dev …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & ors. ….Respondents [ Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge . The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the petitioner: Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I. N. Mehta, Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.Gs. and Mr. Raj Negi, Dy.A.G.
Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan (oral)
The respondents are directed to implement the
judgment in question subject to final outcome of SLP filed by
them in Suraj Mani’s case. Needful be done within a period
four weeks.
2 The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid
terms.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) 27.3.2024 Judge (pankaj)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents must implement a specific judgment pending the outcome of a related Supreme Court appeal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Suraj Mani's caseReferred¶9
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satya Dev
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
