This is a thin execution petition disposed of by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. The court closed the petition and allowed the petitioner appropriate remedial avenues for any remaining grievances.
Execution petition closed and disposed of along with any pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:8841
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ex. Petition (T) No.71 of 2024 Decided on: 19th September, 2024 __________________________________________________________ Meena Devi …Petitioner Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Anr. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate.
Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral)
For the material placed on record, present Execution Petition is closed and disposed of.
2. Needless to say, the petitioner is at liberty to avail
appropriate remedy for redressal of surviving grievances, if any.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- 2 -
2024:HHC:8841
All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any,
also stands disposed of.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge
(Ranjan Sharma) Judge
September 19, 2024
(himani)
Meena Devi
Himachal Road Transport Corporation and Anr.
Vivek Singh Thakur
Ranjan Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
