The court disposed of an execution petition upon receipt of a consideration order rejecting the petitioner's case, reserving liberty to seek appropriate remedies against said order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No.939 of 2024 Date of decision: 11.12.2024
Brijesh Kaushal & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus HPSEB Ltd. ...Respondent.
Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge . Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner : Mr. Onkar Jairath and Mr. Piyush Mehta, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Piyush Rathore, Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record copy of consideration order dated 10.12.2024, rejecting the case of the petitioner.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
-2-
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall
also stand disposed of.
11th December, 2024 (Pardeep)
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
Brijesh Kaushal & Ors.
HPSEB Ltd.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
