Writ petition seeking pension from due date in line with an earlier judgment; petitioner's representation remained undecided. Court directed the competent authority to consider and decide the representation in accordance with law within eight weeks and communicate the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.15128 of 2024 Date of decision: 11.12.2024
Bachni Devi. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge . Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Narender Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Additional Advocate
General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
involved in the case has already been adjudicated upon. The
1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
-2-
grievance of the petitioner is that her representation dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure P-3) has still not been decided by the respondents/competent authority.
-3-
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms,
so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua 11th December, 2024 Judge (Pardeep)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents should be directed to decide the petitioner's representation seeking pension per Balo Devi judgment within a reasonable time.
Bachni Devi
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
