The petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls. The court dismissed the connected public order application (CWPOA) in default. No other pending applications were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No.5326 of 2020 Date of Decision: 03.04.2024
____________________________________________________ Dharam Chand and others
....Petitioners
Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd. & ors.
…Respondents
____________________________________________________ Coram_ The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1
________________________________________________ For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3. ________________________________________________ Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Despite repeated calls, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, we are left with no other option but to dismiss the petition in default. Ordered accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed
of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) April 03, 2024 Judge (VH)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Dharam Chand and others
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Ltd.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
