Disposed

Neel Chand v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC2 Apr 2024EX.P./112/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition concerning work-charge status. Respondents' affidavit confirmed the petitioner was granted work-charge status from 01.01.2002. The court directed respondents to pay consequential benefits within four weeks, subject to the final outcome of an SLP in Surajmani's case, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Consequential benefits payable within four weeks, subject to final outcome of SLP in Surajmani's case.

Neel Chand Vs State of Hp and Others — Service and Employment | Himachal Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.112 of 2024 Decided on: 02.04.2024.

¶2

_________________________________________________________ Neel Chand ....Petitioner

¶3

Versus

¶4

State of H.P. & Ors.	…Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tar Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sus 1 Whether approved for re	lok Singh Chauhan, Judge. hil Kukreja, Judge. porting? No
For the petitioner	: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondents	: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General.

¶5

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No

¶6

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)

¶7

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record compliance affidavit, which goes to indicate that the petitioner has been granted work-charge status w.e.f. 01.01.2002, subject to the final outcome of SLP filed in Surajmani's case.

¶8

In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed, save and except, to direct the respondents to pay the consequential benefits, if any, subject to of course, final outcome of the SLP filed in Surajmani's case. The needful be done within four weeks.

¶9

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

¶10

¶11

The petition is accordingly disposed of, so also pending

¶12

applications, if any.

¶13

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge

¶14

(Sushil Kukreja) Judge

¶15

April 2, 2024 (subhash/raman)

Neel Chand v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neel Chand v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tina Kumari and Others Vs State of Hp and Others

Jagdish Chand Vs State of Hp and Ors.

Mahesh Kumar Vs State of Hp

Sikru Ram and Others Vs State of Hp and Others

Tarawati Vs Hrtc

Kulbhushan Vs Hrtc and Ors.