The High Court of Himachal Pradesh directed the respondents to implement a judgment pending the final outcome of a connected SLP filed by the State.
Respondents directed to implement judgment pending SLP outcome within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ex. Pet. No.113 of 2024 Decided on: 02.04.2024.
_________________________________________________________ Sikru Ram & Others ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
The respondents are directed to implement the judgment in
question subject to final outcome of SLP filed by them in Suraj Mani’s
case. Needful be done within four weeks.
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) Judge
April 2, 2024 (subhash/raman)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Suraj Mani's caseReferred¶6
Suraj Mani's case
Sikru Ram & Others
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
